Philippe Raffi Kalfayan
Observers
were surprised when President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan questioned the fair
application of the Lausanne Treaty recently. In a visit to Athens in
December, he asked for its revision, claiming that “the Muslim
minorities on the Greek border of Western Thrace were not able to choose
their own chief mufti, while the Christian communities in
Turkey enjoyed greater freedom when choosing their Patriarch.”
Previously, he had declared that Lausanne was not such a great victory,
because Turkey had to give away some [now Greek] islands. Meanwhile, he
praised the Lausanne Treaty as the result of the first victory for the
independence of Turkey.
The reaction of the CHP [Republican Kemalist Party] was prompt,
condemning those comments, recalling that the Lausanne Treaty is the
title deed of the Republic of Turkey.
We should take a closer look at that treaty, especially the
conditions in which the treaty was concluded, its consequences for
Armenians inside or outside the country, and how it has been applied so
far by Turkey.