Viken Berberian
On
Tuesday, electoral arithmetic defeated democratic sentiment in Armenia
after the Republican Party of Armenia, the majority party, used its
numerical strength to back a discredited government and block the election of the opposition leader Nikol Pashinyan as the new prime minister.
A
chorus of defiant honks expressing the collective angst filled the
streets of Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, as the disappointing result
became public. Tens of thousands of people had been singing and chanting
outside the parliament throughout the day in support of Mr. Pashinyan’s
election.
Mr. Pashinyan, a former crusading journalist and opposition leader,
had led the massive protests against the government in April, which
culminated in the resignation of the former president and prime
minister, Serzh Sargsyan.
The opposition leader has called upon his supporters to continue civil disobedience and block roads, railways and airports.
As Mr.
Sargsyan’s two terms as president were coming to an end, he took a leaf
out of the playbook of his friend President Vladimir Putin of Russia and
moved to transform Armenia from a presidential system to a parliamentary system of governance.
A controversial referendum
in December 2015, which Mr. Sargsyan’s Republican Party of Armenia won,
ensured the change to the parliamentary system. On April 17, the
Republican Party, which holds the majority of seats in parliament,
elected him prime minister.
But most
Armenians did not want Mr. Sargsyan to rule the country any longer,
especially because he and his party had undermined popular faith in
national elections by resorting to rampant vote buying to secure an electoral majority.
A report
by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe criticized
the Republican Party government after the last parliamentary election in
2017, observing that “vote-buying had become an entrenched part of the
political culture” because of “extreme poverty and a lack of economic
opportunities.”
After
the 2013 presidential election, the OSCE found a close correlation
between high voter turnout and the number of votes received by Mr.
Sargsyan. In polling stations where turnout exceeded 80 percent —
implausibly higher than the national average of 60 percent — Mr.
Sargsyan often received more than 80 percent of the votes, raising “serious problems with voting and counting, and concerns about the integrity of the electoral process.”
Apart
from grave misgivings about the fairness of the electoral process, Mr.
Sargsyan’s failure to stem the decline of the Armenian economy and
growing unemployment have rattled the people. In 2008, during his first
year as president, Armenia’s debt-to-G.D.P. ratio was 13.5 percent. Near
the end of his second term in the autumn of 2017 it had more than quadrupled to 58 percent, or $6.4 billion.
Armenia,
a former Soviet republic that won its independence in 1991, depends
heavily on investment from Russia. The economic downturn in Russia and a
sharp devaluation of the ruble in 2014 resulting from a collapse in
world oil prices hit remittances
from Armenians working there, though they have picked up this past
year. Remittances to Armenia dropped to $1.5 billion in 2016 from $2.3
billion in 2013.
Since independence,
one-third of the population has left the country of 3.2 million in
search of a better life. Many went to Russia, home to the largest
Armenian diaspora. Mr. Sargsyan’s government has largely failed to reverse the exodus, and unemployment is close to 20 percent.
Political corruption under Mr. Sargsyan has further added to popular anxieties. Armenia was ranked 35 out of 100 in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index last year, with 100 being very clean.
The
Republican Party, the largest right-wing party in Armenia, officially
adheres to a free-market ideology. Over the years, it became a home to
oligarchs, apparatchiks and wealthy businessmen who would benefit from
tax exemptions, even as the government struggled to plug a growing
budget deficit. Its members profited from a patron-client system that
privileged party elites. Inequality rose.
The
opposition is a group of minority parties, among them Yelk, or the “Way
Out” alliance led by Mr. Pashinyan, the former journalist, who has led
the recent demonstrations.
Mr.
Pashinyan’s rise is partly a challenge to the legitimacy of previous
elections marred by fraud. He went into hiding in the aftermath of a
disputed presidential election in 2008 and was wanted by the police on
allegations of mass disorder. Mr. Pashinyan was imprisoned in June 2009
until an amnesty was granted to political prisoners about two years
later. He was elected to the parliament in May 2012.
On April 22, Mr. Pashinyan was detained
after a meeting between him and Mr. Sargsyan ended within minutes.
After his arrest, the protests swelled and people filled the streets of
Yerevan. The next morning, Mr. Pashinyan was released. A few hours
later, Mr. Sargsyan resigned, conceding that he was wrong and that Mr. Pashinyan was right.
Despite
Mr. Sargsyan’s resignation and popular sentiment for political change,
the Republican Party chose to use its majority — 58 seats out of 105 —
in the parliament on Tuesday to stop Mr. Pashinyan’s election as prime
minister. Apart from the opposition votes, he needed six votes from the
Republican Party for his election.
On
Tuesday, Mr. Pashinyan received the support of 45 members of the
parliament, signaling a deepening of the political crisis and a
continuation of the peaceful civil disobedience campaign that has often
paralyzed the city in the past two weeks.
Mr.
Pashinyan warned that if the Republicans do not endorse the political
mandate he has won on the street, Armenia would plunge into crisis. A
second parliamentary vote to elect the prime minister is expected next
week.
The next parliamentary
elections are scheduled for 2022, but if parliament fails twice to elect
a new prime minister, snap elections must be held. If the next round of
elections are fair and accountable, the Republican Party’s grip on
governance will be smashed and the party will be out of power for the
first time in decades. It will also restore integrity in the electoral
process and set the foundation for a more inclusive and open society.
"The New York Times," May 2, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment