Jim Yardley
Sebnem Arsu
Pope Francis
on Sunday, April 12, 2015 described the World War I-era slaughter of Armenians by the
Ottoman Turks as the first genocide of the 20th century, igniting a
diplomatic confrontation with Turkey, which quickly summoned the Vatican’s ambassador to condemn the pontiff’s remarks and recalled its own ambassador to the Holy See.
He
also described his frustration with what he considers global
indifference toward the persecution and killing of Christians in the
Middle East and elsewhere, especially by militants with the Islamic
State.
“Today, too, we are experiencing a sort of genocide created by general and collective indifference,” Francis said.
In addressing the Armenian question, Francis quoted from a 2001 declaration
by Pope John Paul II and Catholicos Karekin II, the Armenian Apostolic
Church’s supreme patriarch, in which the two leaders called the Armenian
slaughter a campaign of extermination that was “generally referred to
as the first genocide of the 20th century.”
Vatican
diplomats have been deliberately prudent in avoiding the term, so in
using it during the Mass on Sunday, before an audience that included the
Armenian president, Serzh Sargsyan, Francis clearly intended to provoke
a response. He equated the fate of the Armenians with the genocides
orchestrated by the Nazis and the Soviets under Stalin, while also
condemning “other mass killings, like those in Cambodia, Rwanda, Burundi
and Bosnia.”
“It
seems that humanity is incapable of putting a halt to the shedding of
innocent blood,” Francis said. “It seems that the human family has
refused to learn from its mistakes caused by the law of terror, so that
today, too, there are those who attempt to eliminate others with the
help of a few, and with the complicit silence of others who simply stand
by.”
Francis
said it was a duty of everyone not to forget the “senseless slaughter”
of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks from 1915 to
1923. “Concealing or denying evil is like allowing a wound to keep
bleeding without bandaging it,” the pope added.
Turkey
has long resisted the genocide designation, saying that a large number
of Turks were also killed during and after the First World War, when
Armenians sided with Russian and Western forces in hopes of claiming an
independent homeland in eastern Turkey as the Ottoman Empire was dying.
Many
Armenians have long demanded that Turkey acknowledge that about 1.5
million of their forebears were actually killed in a systematic
genocide. More than 20 countries have passed parliamentary bills
recognizing the killings as genocide, while nations like Greece and
Switzerland have called for criminal charges against those who deny it.
On
Sunday, Turkish officials in Ankara, the capital, summoned Archbishop
Antonio Lucibello, the Vatican’s ambassador to Turkey, and notified him
of their government’s “grave disappointment and sadness” over the pope’s
remarks, which were “away from historical facts” and dismissive of the
deaths of non-Christians in the country during the same historical
period, according to a government official who spoke on the condition of
anonymity, citing diplomatic protocol.
On Twitter, the Turkish foreign minister, Mevlut Cavusoglu,
dismissed Francis’ comments as baseless. “It is not possible to accept
the pope’s statement, which is far from any legal or historical
reality,” he wrote. “Religious authorities are not the places to incite
resentment and hatred with baseless allegations.”
Later, the Foreign Ministry said that Ankara’s ambassador to the Vatican, Mehmet Pacaci, had been recalled for “deliberations.”
Since
becoming pope in March 2013, Francis has made a habit of inserting
himself into delicate foreign policy issues, usually in the role of
broker. Last June, after visiting the Holy Land, he played host to the
Israeli and Palestinian
presidents at a “prayer summit” at the Vatican. However, that failed to
produce a diplomatic breakthrough, and soon afterward, Israeli troops
began an assault against the Hamas militant group in the Gaza Strip.
Francis
was more successful in helping break the decades-old impasse between
Cuba and the United States, and President Obama credited the pontiff and
Vatican diplomats for playing host to a critical secret meeting in the
negotiations and serving as a guarantor trusted by both sides.
Yet
beyond the broker role, Francis also has used the bully pulpit of the
papacy to speak out, often in blunt terms, about issues like what he
sees as the shortcomings of global capitalism (and the attendant problem
of rising inequality) and, especially, his outrage over the
proliferation of war and violence in the world. At different times, he
has spoken out against conflicts in Ukraine, Iraq and Syria as well as
in Africa.
As
leader of one billion Roman Catholics, Francis also has repeatedly
condemned the persecution of Christians in the Middle East and the
“plotters of terrorism,” alluding to militants with the Islamic State.
Last year, he seemed to veer close to endorsing a military attack on the
Islamic State when he said that it would be legitimate for the
international community to confront the group’s “unjust aggression.”
Francis visited Turkey last November, partly to bolster the standing of his friend and ally, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, leader of the country’s Orthodox Christians.
He also met with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as Ankara hoped to
signal a joint campaign against Islamophobia. On Sunday, Turkish
officials portrayed the pope’s latest remarks as a betrayal.
“The
pope’s statement is surprising and disappointing, especially following
his message of dialogue during his visit last November,” said an
official from the prime minister’s office, speaking on the condition of
anonymity by government protocol. “A one-side statement that only
acknowledges the suffering of Christians and ignores the suffering of
the Muslims at that time.
“These kinds of statements only damage and hinder the process of reconciliation,” the official added.
The
issue of reconciliation between Turkey and the country’s Armenian
population remains unresolved. When Mr. Erdogan was the nation’s prime
minister, he suggested that an intergovernmental history commission be
formed between Turkey and Armenia, and perhaps a third country, to assess the issue.
Last
year, Mr. Erdogan stopped short of using the word “genocide” but in an
unprecedented move, he offered condolences to the grandchildren of those
who lost their lives in the events that began in 1915, in a statement
released in nine languages.
Yet since then, any progress toward reconciliation with the Armenian diaspora has been limited.
Turkey’s
relations with the Vatican have had other tense moments since Mr.
Erdogan’s Islamist goverment took power more than a decade ago. In 2004,
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later to become Pope Benedict XVI, expressed
his displeasure at the prospect of Turkey, a predominantly Muslim
nation, joining the European Union.
As
pope, Benedict later withdrew that statement during an official visit
to Turkey in 2006. But that same year he touched off an international
uproar when he quoted a 14th century Byzantine emperor who called the
teachings of the Prophet Muhammad “evil and inhuman.”
Alberto
Melloni, a historian of the Vatican, said Francis’ remarks on Sunday
were consistent with his blunt-spoken style and his sympathy for all
victims. “He decided to use the words that Armenians use, to use the
point of view of the victim,” Mr. Melloni said. “This is very Francis.”
"The New York Times," April 12, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment