Richard G. Hovannisian (*)
Sasun: The History of an 1890s Armenian Revolt. By Justin McCarthy, Ömer Turan, and Cemalettin Taşkiran. (Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 2014. Pp. 496. $32.00.)
The Sasun crisis in 1894 was a watershed in Ottoman-Armenian history,
as it marked the beginning of the process of elimination of the native
Armenian population, continuing with widespread massacres in 1895-1896
and in 1909 and culminating in the genocidal deportations and massacres
of 1915 to 1923. The historiography of more than a century has described
and analyzed in detail the tribulations of the Armenian peasantry in
the mountains of Sasun in the eastern reaches of the Ottoman Empire,
their being stirred up by revolutionaries to resist Kurdish predations,
and their victimization in 1894, reportedly with the involvement of
regular Turkish armed forces.
In this volume, as it were, the authors set out to debunk what they
consider to be the Sasun myth. To that end, the voluminous corpus of
contemporary press accounts, missionary reports, consular dispatches,
diplomatic correspondence and official publications, and the findings of
the European delegates attached to the Ottoman Commission of Inquiry
that were subsequently sent to the region are examined. Each, in turn,
is found to have contributed to the distortion of what really happened
and to creating the false impression of Armenian victimhood and Turkish
and Kurdish aggression, when, as the authors would have it, the
Armenians were in revolt and the truth was more or less the opposite.
Nearly half the volume is meant to discredit the condemnatory report
submitted by the European delegates attached to the Sasun Commission of
Inquiry, though almost all the rest of the book focuses on the prejudice
and irresponsible reporting of European consular and embassy officials,
missionaries, journalists and publishers, and Armenian witnesses. The
authors attribute this fable of murder and mayhem in Sasun to Western,
especially British, propaganda and hostility toward Turks and Islam and
to a desire to find a pretext to interfere further in Ottoman affairs,
purportedly to assist the oppressed Christian minority.
The introductory pages of the text do offer some useful information
on the demography and geography of Sasun, but there is little more that
can be said to commend the collective labor that was committed for this
work. The book lacks any serious discussion of the actual complaints of
the Armenians that led to the formation of revolutionary societies,
which are blamed for the Sasun incidents. The extensive scholarly
literature on the subject, which reaches conclusions fully contrary to
those put forward by the authors, is dismissed out of hand in a terse,
two-page “Bibliographical Note.” It appears that Sasun: The History of an 1890s Armenian Revolt is
only one of a series of revisionist treatises emanating from the
University of Utah Press, with funding from the Turkish Coalition of
America.
Constructive revisionist history is often timely and persuasive, as
it challenges outdated concepts and interpretations. In this case,
however, the arguments are disappointingly skewed and unconvincing.
"Asbarez," September 26, 2017
(*) The Historian, Spring 2017 (vol. 79, issue 1), pp. 184-185
No comments:
Post a Comment