Anne Applebaum
“When I saw the masses of East German citizens
there, I knew they were in the right.” A quarter-century later, that
was how Lt. Col. Harald Jäger explained
his decision to open the gates and let his fellow citizens through the
Berlin Wall. Jäger was guarding a border checkpoint on Nov. 9, 1989, in
the hours after East German leaders had announced that the travel rules
were changing. As Berliners flocked to the wall, demanding to cross into
the West, he asked repeatedly for clarification from his superiors, but
nothing was forthcoming.
In the end, the crowds persuaded him
to act: “At the moment it became so clear to me . . . the stupidity,
the lack of humanity. I finally said to myself: ‘Kiss my arse. Now I
will do what I think is right.’ ” That moment is one of the clearest
illustrations of how and why street demonstrations can sometimes create
political change. They can appeal to a deeper morality and thus persuade
people in power to change course, to abandon a repressive regime, to
stop using force.
I thought of Jäger this week when the prime minister of Armenia surprised his country and
resigned. Serzh Sargsyan was president of Armenia for a decade, from
2008 to 2018, in that time building up a web of business and political
contacts designed to keep him in power. In anticipation of leaving
office, he changed
some of the rules, enhanced the power of the prime minister — and
arranged for the parliament to elect him to that job. This is a familiar
trick: Both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan have played similar games, shifting between the
presidency and the prime ministership to flout their constitutions and
stay in charge.
Armenians
saw through it. For 11 days, large crowds of them protested this
duplicitous power grab, in the capital and elsewhere. Then,
unexpectedly, Sargsyan resigned. “I was wrong,” he declared. “The street
movement is against my tenure. I am fulfilling your demand.”
Surprised Armenians flooded the streets again to celebrate. Thomas de Waal,
the author of several books on Armenia, told me he reckoned Sargsyan
was swayed by the fact that Armenia is a “small country with a high
feeling of national solidarity.” Another possible factor: The last time
Armenians organized mass protests, in March 2008, a police crackdown
left 10 people dead. Perhaps Sargsyan “didn’t want to repeat that
experience.”
Whatever
the true reason, political demonstrations worked in Armenia for the
same reason they worked in Berlin in 1989, and in Kiev, Ukraine, in
2014:
because they moved a key person to question the legitimacy of the
regime, even his own regime. And this, unfortunately, is unusual.
For
every successful pro-democracy street demonstration, I can list just as
many that have failed. Moscow in 2012. Hong Kong in 2014.
Warsaw in 2015. Venezuela in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Sometimes these
demonstrations fail because their demands are too broad and they don’t
catch on. Sometimes they fail because the regime uses violence to stop
them and people get scared. Sometimes they fail because it isn’t enough
to occupy public space: After a while people get tired, fellow citizens
want the streets cleared, everyone has to go back to work.
But
most often they fail because there is no Jäger, there is no Sargsyan,
and the regime refuses to listen. The ruler successfully smears the
protesters as unrepresentative, unpatriotic — or in the pay of
foreigners. Instead of being moved by their sincerity and their numbers,
Putin described protesters in 2012 as evidence of an American plot —
which is exactly what the Chinese claimed about the Hong Kong protesters
in 2014. Nor is this just a tactic used by authoritarians: American
“conservatives” also claimed that students protesting gun laws last
month were being paid to do so.
When they don’t or can’t move
people, demonstrations, marches and “occupy” movements are insufficient.
It’s not enough just to be there: The movement has to join or become a
political party, the street leaders have to become politicians. In
democracies, they need to win elections. In dictatorships, they need
other means to peel away support for the ruling party. In political
vacuums, such as the one right now in Armenia,
they need a strategy. To convert the desire for change into a more just
society is a long project, one which requires people to work for many
years, not just to show up for a few hours.
Demonstrations
matter even when they don’t succeed: They cheer people up, spread
solidarity, keep people inspired. Every once in a while, they achieve
something dramatic. But most of the time, by themselves, it’s important
to remember that unless they can institutionalize the demands of the
crowd — find ways to make them permanent — they aren’t enough.
Muy buen artículo.
ReplyDelete