David Boyajian
Turkey seems fond of so-called ‘false flag’ operations. In 1955, for example, the Turkish government covertly
bombed its own consulate in Thessaloniki, Greece and blamed it on
Greeks. The following day, Turkey stage-managed massive anti-Greek riots in Istanbul that killed over a dozen Christians and caused hundreds of millions in damage.
Fast forward to March 2014. A leaked audiotape caught Turkish officials plotting
to stage ‘false flag’ military attacks on their own territory and blame
them on Syrians. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, General
Yaşar Gürel, and Intelligence chief Hakan Fidan planned to use the
attacks as an excuse to invade Syria. The title of this article could
easily apply to that plot.
To close observers of the Caucasus, however, it could also describe a
failed covert Turkish plan to attack Armenia two decades ago and turn
the geopolitics of the region upside down.
In October 1993, two years after the USSR had splintered, an ethnic Chechen Muslim named Ruslan Khasbulatov – the Speaker, believe it or not, of the Russian Parliament – led a coup against beleaguered Russian President Boris Yeltsin. According to American, French, and Greek officials, Khasbulatov and Muslim Turkey had a secret agreement.
If his coup succeeded, Khasbulatov would order Russian troops to
withdraw from Armenia, where they helped guard the latter’s border with
Turkey. That would pave the way for Turkey to invade the landlocked
Christian nation of just three million inhabitants.
History tells us that Turkey has always wanted to overrun Armenia.
Doing so would create a path to Turkic-speaking Muslim Azerbaijan, the
Caspian Sea, and, eventually, Central Asia. It’s called pan-Turkism.
In 1993, of course, Azerbaijan was losing its war with Armenians over the ancient, majority-Armenian province of Karabagh. Azerbaijan was, therefore, eager for Turkey to attack Armenia, and Turkey was ready to help Azerbaijan turn the tide.
The Plot Fails
Harkening back to the Armenian genocide, Turkish President Turgut Özal had threatened to teach Armenia “the lessons of 1915.” Tansu Çiller, Turkey’s prime minister, warned Armenia that she wouldn’t “sit back and do nothing.” Turkey was massing forces on Armenia’s western border and supplying
Azerbaijan with weapons, military advisors, and paramilitary forces.
Chechen militants and Afghan Mujahideen were already fighting alongside
Azeris.
A successful Turkish attack on Armenia – Russia’s only military
partner in the Caucasus – would have all but destroyed Russian influence
in the region. That, in turn, would have increased the likelihood
that Chechnya, and much of the Muslim North Caucasus, would eventually
escape the Russian Bear’s grip. For a native-born Chechen like
Khasbulatov, it would all be a dream-come-true.
But bombarded by Russian tanks, Speaker Khasbulatov, V.P. Alexander
Rutskoi, and hundreds of rebel parliamentarians and supporters surrendered the Parliament building on October 4, 1993. The coup and the plot to invade Armenia had failed.
The Secret Pact
The Khasbulatov-Turkish pact was first revealed by Leonidas T. Chrysanthopoulos in his book Caucasus Chronicles
(London: Gomidas, 2002). He was Greece’s ambassador to Armenia from
July 1993 to February 1994. Chrysanthopoulos, now 68, has served as
ambassador to Canada and Poland, and was recently Secretary General of
the 12-country, Istanbul-based Black Sea Economic Cooperation
organization.
France’s ambassador to Armenia, Mme. France de Harthing, told him
that “French intelligence sources” confirmed that “the Turkish incursion
into Armenia would take place immediately after Khasbulatov would have
withdrawn the Russian troops from Armenia.” “This information,” wrote
Chrysanthopoulos, “was later confirmed to me by my United States
colleague,” Ambassador Harry J. Gilmore.
As a “pretext,” Turkey would claim to be targeting Kurdish PKK militant bases, which in fact have never existed, in Armenia. Such a “pretext” is similar, though not identical, to a ‘false flag.’
The Turkish strike would be “incursions of a limited nature,” though
it’s unclear what “limited” meant. More likely, as Turkey wouldn’t find
any PKK, the aim was to forge a permanent corridor across Armenia, link
up with Azeri forces, and cleanse Karabagh of Armenians.
The U.S. and France have never, as far as is known, publicly denied
the existence of the Khasbulatov-Turkish plot. Moreover,
Chrysanthopoulos gives no indication that any country tried to talk
Turkey out of its deal with Khasbulatov.
Is any of this relevant today?
NATO Ambitions
Yes, because current Turkish, American, and NATO policies in the
Caucasus strongly echo the 1993 Khasbulatov-Turkish plot. For two
decades, the West has been trying to penetrate and dominate the Caucasus
– Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia –and eventually cross the Caspian
Sea into energy-rich Central Asia.
One piece of the plan has already been partially implemented:
constructing oil and gas pipelines from Azerbaijan through Georgia and
Turkey.
NATO’s remaining goal: absorb the entire Caucasus. NATO would
thereby threaten Russia from the south, just as it now pressures Russia
from the west with its absorption of much of Eastern Europe (and, NATO
hopes, Ukraine).
Georgia and Azerbaijan are inclined to eventually join NATO. Armenia, however, is not, though it has excellent relations with NATO
and the West. Armenia has little choice but to ally itself with Russia
because the former faces an ongoing existential threat from NATO member
Turkey, the 1993 plot being one example.
Armenia is the Caucasus’s linchpin. Had the Khasbulatov – Turkish
quasi-‘false flag’ operation against Armenia succeeded, Russia would
probably have lost, and NATO would have gained, the entire Caucasus.
New provocations, including ‘false flags,’ by Turkey and NATO cannot,
therefore, be ruled out.
Turkish, American, and NATO leaders must also be interrogated as to
whether their policies in the Caucasus are leading to peace or war.
"Veterans Today," June 4, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment