Brian Allen
The Metropolitan Museum of Art is less a
museum than a university—it’s also a big, messy place, as we know from
its many public fumbles. In the last year alone we have seen
its notorious move from free entry to a new $25-per-head admission
charge hitting tourists; a big deficit despite a $3 billion endowment;
and a failed, obscenely expensive $800 million building plan. All of
this said, with the British Museum and the Louvre its only possible
equals, the Met is widely considered the greatest museum in the world,
and its research, publication, and art gathering acumen is peerless.
The show begins with four-sided Christian commemorative columns, or
stelae, from the 4th century, carved with elaborate reliefs of saints,
demons, and princes. The carvings adorned a monastery and are among the
finest examples of early Christian sculpture. Excavations from Dvin, an
ancient Armenian commercial city, uncovered capitals decorated in an
eclectic crossroads style, drawing a little inspiration from places as
far flung as southern Italy, Kurdish regions, Constantinople, and
Persia. Archaeology in Armenia is new; the Aygestan Hoard was discovered
only in 1936, and its haul of exquisite gold jewelry from the tenth and
eleventh centuries is well represented at the Met. Like most of the
objects in the show, the necklaces, bracelets, and earrings have never
before left Armenia. This exhibition is truly fresh.
Explaining the relationship between the Armenian Rite and its art is a
big part of the show and the accompanying catalogue. Carved doors were
more than room dividers. Doors in the Bible were metaphors for spiritual
transitions; many Armenian services occur on both sides of doors,
marking heightened states of blessedness as the service unfolds. They’re
important and treated with great refinement in the show. Radiate
crosses—crosses with arms of equal length, incorporating a sunburst—are
distinctly Armenian symbols. They suggest the Tree of Life, eternity,
and a victory of life renewed generation by generation, rather than
Jesus’s suffering and sacrifice. Among the most beautiful and complex
pieces in “Armenia” is an embossed reliquary with pearls and precious
stones from the early fourteenth century. Some common forms, like arm
reliquaries, descend from the Armenian Church’s early veneration of the
right arm of its founder, St. Gregory the Illuminator. A silver arm
reliquary of St. Nicholas from 1315 has an unsettlingly totemic
presence.
Surely, the most exquisite works in the show are the illuminated
manuscripts. Lavishly decorated pages from the Tabriz 1311 Gospels
combine Anatolian, Greek, and Italian pictorial traditions—the Silk Road
ran through Armenia—while another manuscript from the same time, the Compedium of Chronicles,
depicts a young Muhammad with kneeling camels, angels, and ample
flourishes derived from Armenian style. I loved the pages from a
sixteenth-century Book of Genesis from Keghi. God is not shown
symbolically—with a disembodied hand reaching down through clouds, for
instance—but as a big, bug-eyed head and gesturing hand. For each day of
the Creation, this bible depicts God’s head growing bigger and bigger. A
final page, marking the end of the Creation cycle, shows God’s head as
small, flanked by a gate and appearing to recede from the world back to
Heaven.
This and many other things in the show cried out for further context.
How do they reflect the Armenian Church’s unique take on Christianity?
Does this visual treatment of God suggest a conception less abstract and
more visceral than other branches of Christianity? The show does a good
job on details—a liturgical curtain from 1689 illustrates the sites in
Jerusalem most central to the Armenian Rite—but why these are
central and what they tell us about the Church’s spiritual priorities
are left to us. Also, some good maps and timelines would have helped the
viewer navigate Armenia’s complexity and strangeness. Perhaps the
curators had a scholarly aversion to conveying such basic information,
but it would help the viewer get to the show’s many pleasures.
In almost every commercial hub in the world lived a small, vibrant
Armenian community engaged in trade and commerce. This led to the most
provocative theme of “Armenia.” The catalogue calls it “Armenian
cosmopolitanism”—a mobility, curiosity, and mercantile spunk that made
Armenians useful almost everywhere. They absorbed design inspiration
wherever they went, making their art unique. Armenians in Isfahan in
Persia were bankers to the Safavid shahs; their community has only
recently been studied. They built impressive churches but also, with
characteristic élan, invited Persian design into their Christian
decoration. A page from an illustrated Gospel showing St. John the
Evangelist is organized like an intricate oriental carpet with elaborate
bands and borders. John is surrounded by the opening to the Cave of the
Apocalypse, which is itself a swirling band framing the saint.
I think only the Met could do a show so deeply researched and so
resplendent with major loans. It does credit to the museum, but also to
Armenian-Americans who supported the show financially. They are part of a
big community that thrives today and has enriched our country for
generations. This exhibit spotlights an under-examined yet essential
element of Western history and art.
"City Journal" (www.city-journal.org), Autumn 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment