Arad Nir
Translated by Danny Wool
For years, close ties between Israel and Turkey were
understood to be the reason Jerusalem has avoided the repeated requests
of Armenians for the international community to recognize the genocide
their community suffered at the hands of the Ottoman Turks during World
War I. Not only has Israel refused to recognize that the massacre was
premeditated and planned by the Ottoman government in Istanbul, it has
also exerted its influence in Washington to prevent the United
States from recognizing the genocide. This alone was a good enough
reason for the various Turkish governments to maintain close ties with
Israel. Ankara believed that Israel had almost mystical powers of
influence over the White House and Capitol Hill.
This year, Armenians are marking the centennial of the
genocide. Given the deterioration of its relationship with Turkey, this
occasion would seem to provide Israel with a golden opportunity to
respond to the moral claim that it recognize the Armenian genocide, just
as Pope Francis recently did, followed by the European Parliament. In fact, dozens of prominent Israeli artists and academics recently signed a petition calling on the Israeli government and Knesset to recognize the Armenian genocide.
Nevertheless, officially, Israel continues to squirm. The
Foreign Ministry recommends showing greater empathy to the Armenian
issue, and this will be the first year that Israel will send an official delegation
to participate in the memorial ceremony to take place in Yerevan. It
will, however, be a low-ranking delegation, made up of Knesset members.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Emmanuel Nahshon presented Israel’s official
position to Al-Monitor, saying: “Israel’s position has not changed. We
are sensitive and attentive to the terrible tragedy of the Armenian
people during the First World War, and express our empathy and
solidarity. Most of the international community’s efforts must be
focused on preventing humanitarian tragedies in the future.”
A few senior Israeli officials dealing with the issue spoke
to Al-Monitor about it on condition of anonymity. They emphasized that
this doesn’t just involve susceptibility toward Turkish sensitivities,
but also sensitivity that Israel wants to show toward Azerbaijan, which
is a neighbor of both Turkey and Armenia. Since the Soviet Union's
collapse, the borders in the Caucasus region have been redefined. One
consequence is a continuing state of war between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
One of the pillars of Azerbaijan’s new national narrative is the “Khojaly massacre,”
which refers to a battle in the village of Khojaly, located in the
disputed Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, on Feb. 26, 1992.
According to the Azeri narrative, Armenian forces killed 600 Azeri
civilians there, including 169 women and children.
In this instance, the Armenians deny responsibility for the
massacre of civilians, just as they do for a long list of atrocities
that the Azeris have blamed on them since WWI. Given this relationship,
it's no wonder that the Azeris describe Armenian claims of genocide as
fabricated. Last week’s decision by the European Parliament to use the
term “Armenian genocide” was described by a spokesman for the Azeri
Foreign Ministry as “an attempt to falsify the history [and] its interpretation for political purposes” stemming from the parliament’s succumbing to Armenian pressure.
Gallia Lindenstrauss of Israel’s Institute for National
Security Studies says that Azerbaijan is the Muslim country with which
Israel currently has the closest ties. Trade between Israel and Azerbaijan
is estimated at over $5 billion. Israel imports some 40% of its oil
from there, and exports mainly weapons and sophisticated defense systems
to it. In 2012, when talk of an Israel strike against Iran was at its
peak, Foreign Policy quoted a senior US official as saying (apparently
with considerable hyperbole), “The Israelis have bought an airfield …
and the airfield is called Azerbaijan.”
About six months ago, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon paid
his first public visit to Azerbaijan. Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman
has visited Baku, the capital, on several occasions. While there, both
of them heard from their hosts that Azerbaijan, like the Israeli
government, considers Iran’s nuclear capacity to be an existential
threat.
Azerbaijan’s border with Iran stretches for 611 kilometers
(380 miles), making it longer even than Turkey’s border with Iran, which
is 499 kilometers (310 miles) long. Meanwhile, Armenia’s border with
Iran stretches for just 35 kilometers (22 miles). If the length of their
borders can be used to determine the importance of relations with those
countries, then Armenia is the least important of all of them. And in
general, it is considered an ally of the country that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu compares to Hitler’s Germany.
Coming back to the official position presented by the
Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman, it would seem that the call to the
international community “to prevent humanitarian tragedies in the
future” might not refer only to the incidents of mass murder committed
daily by the Islamic State against anyone who is not one of them
— Yazidis, Christians or Alawites. It is mainly directed against Iran’s “explicit intent of obliterating the Jewish state,” as Netanyahu reiterated April 16 at
Yad Vashem during a memorial service for the victims of the Holocaust.
Herein lies the real reason for Israel’s policy concerning whether it
will recognize the Armenia genocide. The reason isn’t Turkey; it’s Iran.
"Al Monitor," April 22, 2015 (www.al-monitor.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment